Long-term safety and effectiveness of unprotected left main coronary stenting with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents.

نویسندگان

  • Young-Hak Kim
  • Duk-Woo Park
  • Seung-Whan Lee
  • Sung-Cheol Yun
  • Cheol Whan Lee
  • Myeong-Ki Hong
  • Seong-Wook Park
  • Ki Bae Seung
  • Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
  • Myung-Ho Jeong
  • Yangsoo Jang
  • Hyo-Soo Kim
  • In-Whan Seong
  • Hun Sik Park
  • Taehoon Ahn
  • In-Ho Chae
  • Seung-Jea Tahk
  • Wook-Sung Chung
  • Seung-Jung Park
چکیده

BACKGROUND Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease who received drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS In the multicenter registry evaluating outcomes among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis undergoing stenting with either bare metal stents (BMS) or DES, 1217 consecutive patients were divided into 2 groups: 353 who received only BMS and 864 who received at least 1 DES. The 3-year outcomes were compared by use of the adjustment of inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted method. Patients receiving DES were older and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and multivessel disease. In the overall population, with the use of DES, the 3-year adjusted risk of death (8.0% versus 9.5%; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 1.40; P=0.976) or death or myocardial infarction (14.3% versus 14.9%; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 1.40; P=0.479) was similar compared with BMS. However, the risk of target lesion revascularization was significantly lower with the use of DES than BMS (5.4% versus 12.1%; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.73; P=0.003). When patients were classified according to lesion location, DES was still associated with lower risk of target lesion revascularization in patients with bifurcation (6.9% versus 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.78; P=0.009) or nonbifurcation (3.4% versus 10.3%; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.88; P=0.024) lesions with a comparable risk of death or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS Compared with BMS, DES was associated with a reduction in the need for repeat revascularization without increasing the risk of death or myocardial infarction for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a Hong Kong experience.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the intermediate-term outcomes of patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in Hong Kong. DESIGN Historical cohort. SETTING A regional hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS Patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease undergoing stenting with bare-metal stents or drug-eluting stents ...

متن کامل

Stents versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND Several studies have compared the treatment effects of coronary stenting and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, there are limited data regarding the long-term outcomes of these two interventions for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. METHODS We evaluated 1102 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease who underwent stent impl...

متن کامل

Long-term follow-up after percutaneous treatment of the unprotected left main stenosis in high risk patients not suitable for bypass surgery.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Percutaneous coronary intervention is recommended in patients with unprotected left main stenosis non suitable for coronary artery bypass graft. Long-term follow-up of those patients remains uncertain. METHODS All patients with de novo unprotected left main stenosis treated with stent implantation were consecutively enrolled. Percutaneous coronary intervention was ...

متن کامل

Clinical results of unprotected left main coronary stenting.

BACKGROUND Although unprotected left main coronary artery disease is considered by contemporary guidelines to be an indication for surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention may be necessary in patients at high surgical risk. OBJECTIVES To assess the outcome of angioplasty in the treatment of unprotected LMCA disease. METHODS Angiographic and clinical data were collected prospectively for ...

متن کامل

Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry.

OBJECTIVES We performed the long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients in a multicenter study receiving left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization. BACKGROUND Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent coronary stent procedure or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS We evaluated 2,240 patients wit...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation

دوره 120 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009